February 27th, 2008
2006 Polaris FS Classic
You do realize that this is exactly the same sled as the FS Touring, right? So if you’ve expect this review to be much different than the previous one, I’d have to disappoint you right from the start. The Classic does have one advantage over the Touring, though – the fact that it is smaller. It’s also lighter which makes it even faster than the Touring. The smaller size makes it easier to handle and work the corners with. The comfort level is still that high, but unfortunately all the downsides are also valid. So here are the specifications for the FS Classic:
MODEL FS Classic
M.S.R.P. * $8,399.00
ENGINE Four-stroke, Liquid Cooled, 2-cylinder
DISPLACEMENT 750 cc
BORE X STROKE 85 x 66 mm
CARBURETION EFI
IGNITION Bosch - Closed Loop
CLUTCH P-85 / TEAM
SUSPENSION Front: IQ; Nitrex Select shocks; Fox, HPG, IFP Track shocks; 10 in. travel
Rear: Fast M-10 128; Fox, HPG, IFP Track shocks; 13 in. travel
BRAKES Phantom, Hydraulic Disc
EXHAUST Single
SKIS Composite
LENGTH 115 in.
WIDTH 48 in.
HEIGHT 51 in.
TRACK LXWXH 128 x 15 x 1.25 in.
SKI STANCE 42.5 in.
DRY WEIGHT 565 lbs.
FUEL CAPACITY 9.2 gal.
If I must choose between those two – the FS Touring and the FS Classic I’ll go with the Classic, so if you’ve absolutely fallen for those two sleds (although I don’t see a reason for that) and still wondering which one to choose, I suggest do go with the Classic version. Still, if anything else is on the “wonder” list – go with it. Or go for the newer versions of those two – there’s no way they’re as bad.