February 27th, 2008

2006 Polaris FS Classic

2006-polaris-fs-classic.jpg

You do realize that this is exactly the same sled as the FS Touring, right? So if you’ve expect this review to be much different than the previous one, I’d have to disappoint you right from the start. The Classic does have one advantage over the Touring, though – the fact that it is smaller. It’s also lighter which makes it even faster than the Touring. The smaller size makes it easier to handle and work the corners with. The comfort level is still that high, but unfortunately all the downsides are also valid. So here are the specifications for the FS Classic:

MODEL    FS Classic
M.S.R.P. *    $8,399.00
ENGINE    Four-stroke, Liquid Cooled, 2-cylinder
DISPLACEMENT    750 cc
BORE X STROKE    85 x 66 mm
CARBURETION    EFI
IGNITION    Bosch - Closed Loop
CLUTCH    P-85 / TEAM
SUSPENSION    Front: IQ; Nitrex Select shocks; Fox, HPG, IFP Track shocks; 10 in. travel
Rear: Fast M-10 128; Fox, HPG, IFP Track shocks; 13 in. travel
BRAKES    Phantom, Hydraulic Disc
EXHAUST    Single
SKIS    Composite
LENGTH    115 in.
WIDTH    48 in.
HEIGHT    51 in.
TRACK LXWXH    128 x 15 x 1.25 in.
SKI STANCE    42.5 in.
DRY WEIGHT    565 lbs.
FUEL CAPACITY    9.2 gal.

If I must choose between those two – the FS Touring and the FS Classic I’ll go with the Classic, so if you’ve absolutely fallen for those two sleds (although I don’t see a reason for that) and still wondering which one to choose, I suggest do go with the Classic version. Still, if anything else is on the “wonder” list – go with it. Or go for the newer versions of those two – there’s no way they’re as bad.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.